The why lives in 40 Slack threads
Finding it again burns review time and turns leadership updates into thread archaeology.
Verachi reads Slack, Jira, and GitHub read-only, then creates cited decision records with owners, risks, and review history attached.
By the time security, incident review, or a new lead asks why, the rationale is split across Slack threads, tickets, and PR comments. Teams lose hours reconstructing decisions when risk is already live.
Finding it again burns review time and turns leadership updates into thread archaeology.
Who agreed to watch the retry queue? What was the mitigation? Risk gets reconstructed under launch pressure.
Manual status docs drift from source. Approvers get the conclusion without the evidence behind it.
Verachi closes the gap by creating a decision record from the source material, then keeping owners, risks, and evidence attached as the project changes.
Four steps, no migration. Verachi reads what's already happening and turns it into something you can act on.
Before Verachi reads a workspace: admins approve connector scopes, generated claims require citations, and sync or write-back history stays auditable.
Link Slack, Jira, and GitHub read-only. No data leaves its source until your admin approves the scope.
Decisions become records with resolution, rationale, and the source artifacts that prove them.
Guidelines check decisions and pull requests, opening risks that keep owner and evidence visible.
On Pro, ask Verachi about a project and get an answer drawn from cited workspace sources.
Risks, dependencies, and AI answers attach to the record instead of becoming another place to check.
Capture the resolution, the rationale, who reviewed it, and the source artifacts behind it — so the decision survives the thread it was made in.
Cited from
When a guideline fails or a PR raises concern, Verachi opens a risk tied to the decision, owner, evidence, and next step.
Pro adds AI answers over your connected sources. Every factual claim comes back with a citation, and Verachi flags missing support directly.
The blocker for tools like this is usually trust. Verachi puts trust controls in the main workflow.
Slack, Jira, and GitHub connect with read access. Optional write-backs are configured explicitly and recorded — nothing happens to your systems by surprise.
Summaries and answers cite their sources. If a claim can't be supported, Verachi says so plainly instead of inventing confidence.
Every sync, generated summary, and write-back is visible in the workspace activity log. Sensitive actions stay traceable.
Raw threads, issue descriptions, and PR bodies aren't kept long-term. Verachi stores its own conclusions plus links and metadata back to the source.
Your admin approves connector scopes before Verachi reads workspace context. Tenant isolation is enforced at the data layer.
API keys, notification controls, and a full activity log are core capabilities. Review the connector scopes and data boundaries before any production use.
Hosted in Japan, the EU, the US, and Mexico — and deployable in the region your team needs.
For a DPA, sub-processor list, or to scope a review, email security@verachi.io.
Start with the workspace. Add AI when answers need citations. Use Enterprise when governance, limits, or procurement need review.
Free and Pro are self-serve. Enterprise starts with a custom conversation before connectors read your workspace.
Choose Free for cited records and risk ownership without AI.
Choose Pro for cited AI answers over connected sources.
Choose Enterprise when security review or custom limits come first.
Create a Free or Pro workspace now. Use the form when security, data-region, or deployment review should happen before connectors read your workspace.
Thanks for reaching out. We'll review your request and follow up by email to agree scope and next steps.